Getting the Performance Appraisal Right
By: Tushar Bhatia
Date: April 19th, 2010
Posted in: Employee Appraisals, HR Best Practices, HR Technology, Human Resources, Performance Management | 39 Comments »
Most companies want to appraise their employees on a periodic basis and their Human Resources
department is generally responsible to manage this process. I have often seen that the buy-in and participation from the Line managers is not as much as one would expect. Based on my meetings with a large number of HR managers, Line Managers & Senior Level Executives, I have come to realize that there is much more to a Performance Appraisal than what is truly understood by all stakeholders.
This article discusses how HR Managers can create a Performance Appraisal System that adds true value to the organization and becomes a useful and strategic employee development tool.
Define the Objectives
Do HR managers understand why organizations need to carry out the Performance Appraisal process? Some of the common reasons are:

- Salary Increments: Commonly believed to be the only purpose from an employee’s perspective and typically the least important from the management’s perspective.
- Goal achievements and related bonuses/commissions.
- Promotions and transfers
- Succession Planning
- Identification of Top Performers and Non-performers
- Identifying Competencies Gaps for Training Management
- Confirmation of probationers
The objectives may differ for different levels of employees but together these help in defining the appraisal content, forms, ratings, weights & scales, employee evaluation parameters and the appropriate process for conducting the appraisal.
Understand the Process
Once objectives for the Performance Appraisal are identified, it is important to define the different steps in the appraisal process. The same process may not fit all situations.
For instance, Succession Planning, Promotions and Transfers will typically involve Heads of Departments and Senior level managers in the decision cycle whereas Salary Increments, Goal Achievements, Confirmation of probationers & competency gap analysis, may require participation of Line Managers and 2nd level managers.
In cases where only white-collar employees are being appraised, we may like to involve appraisees at the start of the process by including a self appraisal and an appraisal acceptance at the end of the process. In appraisals for blue-collared employees, the employees may be involved only at the end.
Similarly, in an hierarchical organization the work-flow and relationships will need to be defined well to begin with (especially for special cases such as heads of departments, General Managers etc.) and in a Matrix organization the focus may be on peer, senior and subordinate reviews.
Without getting the process right, it is very difficult to get required participation from the stakeholders.
Communicate-communicate and communicate
HR can play a vital role by communicating the objectives of the appraisal process to both employees and their managers. Structured and timely communication can help everyone appreciate the process and encourage transparency and objectivity. I have found that if HR communicates the process extensively, the level of participation and enthusiasm is higher and the process completes without delays.
The different ways in which communication can be carried out include:

- Publish on the employee portal the start of the appraisals, the process details and key time-lines.
- If yours is a large company, it may be a good idea to print some posters and display these at strategic locations.
- Definitely include the performance appraisal process in the Employee Handbook.
- Hold workshops for employees and managers: explain the process, answer queries, describe scenarios and mention benefits.
- Develop an appraisal form that should communicate the process from each stakeholder’s perspective. The form should communicate the role of employee, manager, and any other people involved in the process.
- Don’t hide any surprises. If you Normalize employee scores, include that in all communications such that employees and managers are aware that final scores may be changed.
- If possible, involve senior management in talking about the importance of the process and its timely completion.
Timely completion is a must
Stated mathematically: Enthusiasm is inversely proportional to the time taken to complete the activity i.e if the appraisal process takes longer, the enthusiasm in it will wane. So, what are the ideal time-lines for an appraisal process?
In working with many companies I have found that each step in the appraisal process should take no longer than 4 – 5 business days. As an illustration, the different steps in the appraisal process and their time-lines may be :
|
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Employee Completing their self-appraisal and submitting to their managers | 2 days | ||
| Managers completing the appraisal process and submitting to Heads of Departments | 5 to 10 days (depending on the team size) | ||
| Heads of Departments finalizing employee scores for their departments and releasing to HR | 2 to 5 days | ||
| HR conducting Normalization (removal of departmental bias) across the organization , finalizing appraisal scores and submitting appraisals to managers | 3 to 12 days (depends on the level of interaction required) | ||
| Managers discussing appraisals with employees and submitting for their final acceptance | 2 to 5 days (depending on the team size) | ||
| Employees accepting their appraisal and signing off | 1 day | ||
| Total Time Taken | 15 to 35 days |
To ensure that the time-lines are met, HR should constantly get a status check on the process and not hesitate to remind employees & managers when behind schedule. Don’t hesitate to involve senior managers if the process is way behind schedule.
Does access to archived appraisals help?
Managers expect behavioral changes in their employees based on past years appraisal discussions. In addition, employees and managers decide on an
achievement plan for the next year which could include target achievement plan, development plan, mentoring plan etc.. Without access to these notes, recording achievements in the next years appraisal is not only difficult, but it makes the process less objective.
Add to this the challenge of changed employee-manager relationships over the year; each year’s appraisal becomes a new beginning instead of a continuation of the employee’s performance over many years.
How can the HR department help in this?
For one, HR should introduce a process of goal setting where employees and managers define the goals at the beginning of the year and submit to HR after finalization. Don’t worry if the goals are not SMART to begin with.
Secondly, HR should provide access to past appraisals and goal achievements of employees to the managers.
Of course, this can be a challenge if you are spread across many locations or have difficulty in managing thousands of electronic or paper based appraisals. We shall discuss this in the “Technology as an enabler” section ahead.
Integration with other data is important
In most organizations, appraisals are largely carried out on goal achievements and competencies or skills. Are these the only two areas on which managers should appraise employees? Would it be helpful to know details of many intangibles such as:

- Number of rewards/ recognitions
- Involvement in a disciplinary case,and violation of safety norms
- Timeliness of employee (How many times was the employee late, how many times did the employee take leave without permission from the manager etc.)
- Type & duration of training attended
- Employee counseling records.
- Participation in external events that got the company some recognition
- Publications/ contributions to professional journals.
- Opinions of other employees and seniors, especially for employees in leadership roles.
- Length of service and other employee related data, especially past experience & qualifications
- Employee achievements note with review by the manager & seniors.
Our experience, while working with many organizations, reveals that most managers remember the last few months of employees contributions (or the lack-of it) and rate employees on that bias. To avoid this, we strongly recommend that multiple data points are linked to the appraisal and are freely accessible to the manager to accurately rate an employee.
Technology as an enabler
The biggest challenge to implement an effective Performance Appraisal process is the large volume of data that has to be collected and managed on a daily basis. In addition, linking
data from various sources, providing up-to-date status reports to the management, validation of completed appraisals, normalization of scores, and finalization of appraisals for increments, promotions etc. is a time consuming and laborious task.
Availability of on-line help, for example details of rating – that pops-up when the manager wants to rate a competency can help managers quickly complete the appraisal.
Recording on the employee’s Goal Sheet the periodic achievements & status of completion of each goal along with counseling notes of the manager is not possible without technology.
Technology can become a big savior and an Integrated HR product such as EmpXtrack can help in quickly meeting the objectives of the process with minimum transaction effort.
The ready-to-use Employee Appraisal module with multiple form templates, numerous work-flows, built in validation and automatic calculation of scores, reminders and escalation messages, on-line help and availability of instant status updates helps in putting the process on an auto-pilot and can save significant time for both HR and the line managers.
EmpXtrack is an integrated HR software that combines all aspects of an employee’s life cycle in an easy-to-use browser-based application. It integrates Goal Setting and Tracking, Appraisals, Training, Time, Leave and Attendance, Recruitment, Rewards and Recognitions or other employee related data. All these can be automatically captured or imported in EmpXtrack and can be linked to the Employee Appraisal module for an effective, transparent and objective evaluation.
Read more on ‘Employee Performance Management (EPM)’ in our white paper published on our web-site earlier.
To help design an Appraisal System for your organization or to enable an existing process on a web-based software you may Contact Us with details of your requirements.



April 20th, 2010 at 4:44 am
[...] Getting the Performance Appraisal Right | Talent Junction – An HR Blog http://www.empxtrack.com/blog/04/getting-the-performance-appraisal-right – view page – cached Most companies want to appraise their employees on a periodic basis and their Human Resources department is generally responsible to manage this process. I have Tweets about this link Topsy.Data.Twitter.User['empxtrack'] = {“location”:”",”photo”:”http://a1.twimg.com/profile_images/252043742/empxtrack-logo_normal.gif”,”name”:”EmpXtrack”,”url”:”http://twitter.com/empxtrack”,”nick”:”empxtrack”,”description”:”Integrated Human Capital (HR) & Talent Management Software”,”influence”:”"}; empxtrack: “How to get the Performance Appraisal Right? Visit http://bit.ly/cZ4zQK ” 23 minutes ago view tweet retweet Topsy.Data.Twitter.User['tushar_bhatia'] = {“location”:”",”photo”:”http://s.twimg.com/a/1271725794/images/default_profile_4_normal.png”,”name”:”Tushar Bhatia”,”url”:”http://twitter.com/tushar_bhatia”,”nick”:”tushar_bhatia”,”description”:”",”influence”:”"}; tushar_bhatia: “Published article on "How to get Performance Appraisal Right" @ http://lnkd.in/7W_uDE http://www.empxtrack.com/ ” 24 minutes ago view tweet retweet Filter tweets [...]
April 20th, 2010 at 10:57 pm
Great Job explaining the complete appraisal management process. I am sure HR community will be greatly benefited by this.
However, the real challenge lies in getting consensus of employees on appraisal process and the end result of the appraisal – i.e. compensation or promotions.
Whatever amount of efforts companies put in maintaining secrecy of the salaries, employees always come to know the compensation plans of their peers. This gives them basis for comparison.
Consider a situation, where an employee get good scores in appraisal, but his/her increment is lower than the ones who get low scores; and if this person come to know?? They are sure to start looking out.
One solutions to this is by maintaining the grades across the company so there is no need to maintain confidentiality. However, the differentiation in the salaries can be done by increasing the loyalty components, age factors etc.
April 21st, 2010 at 12:45 am
Thank you Gireesh for your comments.
As discussed above, the appraisal objective would decide the process and this needs to be communicated to the stakeholders at the start.
The salary increments may depend on other factors too such as normalization, compa ratio, goal achievements besides soft parameters such as length of service, criticality of employe etc.
If line managers are involved in increment finalization then they may be in a better position to discuss the same with their teams and there may be higher acceptance.
EmpXtrack Compensation Planning module at http://empxtrack.com/performance-management-system/pay-for-performance allows managers to be involved in the process
April 21st, 2010 at 7:09 am
That’s true that line managers can be involved in the compensation process too, however, having so extensive process requires a strong HR leadership at top. Unfortunately, HR still holds back seat in small, medium and medium large companies. how can hr escalate to strategic role?
April 21st, 2010 at 9:50 pm
Business without strategy make it hard for employees to set work objectives.
There are different approaches to setting leadership behavior goals, in addition.
Goals leading nowhere + different approaches to leadership goals endanger of business productivity + measurement of accomplishments respectively.
May 3rd, 2010 at 12:14 pm
I’m happy I’m not the lone one who feels this way. I endeavor to write intriguing posts with info, but I can’t be one of those blogs that’s purely informative, even if I do stick to a couple subjects. I too favour reading blogs with that individualised factor.
May 7th, 2010 at 1:21 pm
Great post. I have been searching for this exact info for a while now. I will bookmark it in the public bookmarking sites to get you more traffic.
May 7th, 2010 at 8:16 pm
[...] Getting the Performance Appraisal Right | Talent Junction – An HR Blog [...]
May 8th, 2010 at 9:44 am
[...] Tushar’s own very informative Getting the Performance Appraisal Right. [...]
May 9th, 2010 at 10:58 pm
Wonderful insight
May 11th, 2010 at 10:14 am
I’ve been using it for years and wouldnt use anything else!
May 11th, 2010 at 10:38 am
[...] Getting tһе Performance Appraisal Rіɡһt | Talent Junction – Aח HR… [...]
May 12th, 2010 at 11:14 am
Thanks for good information that comes out to
read.
May 12th, 2010 at 12:29 pm
nice share, good
article, very usefull for me…thank you
May 12th, 2010 at 8:49 pm
I had been roaming Search engines for some awesome music and videos of my favored artists and I ran across your cool website, most with the time when I visit blogs I’m searching for anything certain and I leave quickly right after. But within your case the data you will be providing in this post made me desire to reply and show my appreciated, so We’ve bookmarked you web site as well. Keep publishing and thank you! =)
May 13th, 2010 at 12:27 am
Hello,Great blogging dude! i am just Fed up with using RSS feeds and do you use twitter?so i can follow you there:D.
PS:Have you thought putting video to your blog to keep the people more interested?I think it works.Sincerely, Sidney Cartaya
May 15th, 2010 at 12:38 am
I delight in what you be struck by done here. I like the associate oneself with where you say you are doing this to around back but I would suppose through all the comments that this is working conducive to you as well.
May 15th, 2010 at 11:21 am
One again, your idea is very
good.thank you!very much.
May 16th, 2010 at 5:01 am
[...] Getting the Performance Appraisal Right | Talent Junction – An HR Blog [...]
May 16th, 2010 at 5:41 am
Hello, great post.
May 16th, 2010 at 5:00 pm
Story, i enjoyed sharing this.
May 17th, 2010 at 12:48 am
very well
information you write it very clean. I’m very lucky to get this information from you.
May 17th, 2010 at 5:52 pm
thank! for this news it’s a good infomation !
May 17th, 2010 at 8:10 pm
Good day, I was scanning something different about this on another blog. Interesting. Your perspective onto it is diametrically contradicted to what I read earlier. I’m still pondering with the opposite points of view, but I’m leaning to a large degree toward yours. And irrespective, that’s what is so great about modern-day democracy and the marketplace of ideas online.
May 18th, 2010 at 7:50 am
Hey keep up the great work.
May 18th, 2010 at 11:05 pm
yeah,I’ve been following this blog with regard to right now and I would say I am beginning to like your post.
May 30th, 2010 at 2:34 pm
this post is very usefull thx!
June 4th, 2010 at 11:05 pm
well written blog. Im glad that I could find more info on this. thanks
June 18th, 2010 at 5:46 am
found your site on del.icio.us today and really liked it.. i bookmarked it and will be back to check it out some more later
June 20th, 2010 at 7:04 am
Valuable info. Lucky me I found your site by accident, I bookmarked it.
June 21st, 2010 at 2:37 am
Wow this is a great resource.. I’m enjoying it.. good article
August 18th, 2010 at 6:30 pm
Employee involvement: a key to performance appraisal systems worldwide. It’s amazing that such dinosaurs (performance review systems, not the people) are still around. They must be, however, since a book has been published called “Get Rid of Performance Reviews’. Yet despite the outcry against reviews, there’s nothing wrong with them that can’t be fixed by getting managers off of center stage. Top management can fix the basic problems the review system faces.
Critics argue that performance reviews not only don’t accomplish what they’re supposed to do – that is, improve performance, enhance employee skills and achieve planned outcomes – they have unintended negative consequences. In many cases, unfortunately, that’s true. But it doesn’t have to be that way. What companies need to abolish is not performance review itself, but the idea that it’s a “management tool. Here are some practiced paradigms that must be discarded:
Performance Review is designed, as the name suggests, in support of managers. If you believe this, your management is one of the roadblocks to exceptional performance. The most useful performance review support work relationships between employees (managers too are employees). Both parties need to address the question of how to best serve the goals and outcomes and align their work efforts.
Performance review is a management tool. Managers are not necessarily the best qualified to assess their staff’s accomplishments. In fact, they may have a very limited or biased view. A more complete and accurate picture results when employees and managers seek feedback from a variety of customers, team leaders, professional peers, and others inside or from outside the unit.
Performance reviews include judgments from a “higher authority”. Judgments produce compliant workers – people who are told what to do – not innovative ones. People hate performance reviews because most of them are fault-finding. How much better to ask, “What did we learn from this? What can we each do different the next time?”
The manager is responsible for obtaining input from the employees. 21st century employees can’t assume a passive role in performance review, providing “tough-minded” self-assessments and valuable insights only on request. They must take the initiative, soliciting feedback from their managers and others. No risk taking to solicit the complete picture and no learning means no improvements.
Managers should be trained in performance reviews, then prepare their employees for the process. If performance review is to be a productive partnership with employees taking the active role and both parties committed to exchanging knowledge and ideas, managers and employee need to be trained together.
March 15th, 2011 at 8:20 am
Thanks Tushara,
You have made a great contribution to the HR society as a whole and to me in particular, as I have found some information, which I have been looking for.
I have often found that the toughest part is to take people in to confidence about the purpose of performance appraisal, as companies do not pay much attention to salary increment / promotion part in connection with the PA Review report of the employees. This results to a non-bothered attitude in at least some of the employees.
I am of the opinion that earning/losing part should be more concerned with the result of a accurately conducted Performance Appraisal Report.
Thanks,
Shafi.K.P
HR & Administration Manager
Palm International LLC,
Dubai, UAE.
March 15th, 2011 at 11:07 pm
Thanks for your appreciation Shafi.
Tushar
March 17th, 2011 at 9:40 am
i think performance appraisal is much required for improving skills of employeesss.. u mentioned very good points here.
March 17th, 2011 at 9:44 am
plz tushar will u suggest me any recent topic for my synopsis in PhD HR
March 18th, 2011 at 1:16 am
Hi Isha,
Let us discuss next week about how we can help you in your PhD synopsis.
P/s thanks for you comments
Regards
Tushar
December 16th, 2011 at 5:06 am
My brother recommended I might like this blog. He was once entirely right. This post actually made my day. You cann’t imagine simply how much time I had spent for this information! Thank you!
January 21st, 2012 at 2:38 am
it was a wonderful article.i was searching for approximately a month for these information.thank you